Average Rating:
Sort by:
Shorts are too tight in the legs. By Dan the man from San Diego, CA on 11/12/2009 Describe Yourself: Frequent Exerciser Bottom Line: No, I would not recommend this to a friend Comments: Good material. Poor design with tight legs.
Item is smaller than it appears By Jeremy from Schenectady, New York on 11/02/2009 Cons: Need to have skinny legs, Poor Craftsmanship, Restricts Movement, Too tight around the leg Describe Yourself: Conditioning Exerciser Bottom Line: No, I would not recommend this to a friend Comments: It looked like a great product. I had never bought boxers of this quality. The fit was very tight around the leg openings. These are definitely meant for men with skinnier legs and not muscular or large legs. They have no stretch or give to them.
Cut too small for Americans By chriskorus from Los Angeles, CA on 09/14/2009 Cons: Cut too small, Restricts Movement, Too Thin Bottom Line: No, I would not recommend this to a friend Comments: Probably fits skinny Englishmen, but not a regular American. However, if you wear those skinny type pants, they would probably work for you.
By wszal from Pioneer Valley, MA on 09/08/2009 Describe Yourself: Frequent Exerciser Bottom Line: Yes, I would recommend this to a friend Comments: These are my everyday boxers. They seem great. At first I though they might be a little restrictive, but they have been fine in that area.
the finest boxers I've ever owned By a serious shopper with high expectations from Bethesda, MD & Wilmington, DE on 07/23/2009 Pros: Comfortable, Lightweight, Moisture Wicking, Soft Best Uses: Everyday Wear, Travel, Warm Weather Describe Yourself: Occasional Exerciser Bottom Line: Yes, I would recommend this to a friend Comments: These Sunspel boxers are the finest summer boxer shorts I've ever worn. They are extremely comfortable and fit wonderfully.
By Long Cut Chemist from Akron, OH on 07/08/2009 Pros: Comfortable, Lightweight, Soft, Styley Bottom Line: Yes, I would recommend this to a friend Comments: I bought multiple pairs in both the "long cut" and the "full cut" in the same order. I'm keeping both cuts, but I am ordering more long cuts. The full cut has maybe one more inch, laid flat, at the leg opening. The long cut is about half an inch to an inch longer. Not a huge difference between the two cuts. I wear 32-34 pants, wear a 34 belt, and the M size fits me well in both cuts. All in all I prefer the long cut because it looks better on me when that's all I'm wearing. Not that I look bad in the full cut, mind you.
sunspel cotton boxer shorts long cut By Mike from Pittsburgh area on 06/15/2009 Describe Yourself: Occasional Exerciser Bottom Line: No, I would not recommend this to a friend Comments: The main problem with these boxers is that the legs are to narrow. They bind while I take a normal stride.
The material is very nice, and the waist band comfortable and soft. But I only kept the pair I tried on.
I have skinny legs and they didn't fit, anyone with big thighs wouldn't be able to get them on.
quality construction a plus By uncle bob from elizabethtown,pa on 06/03/2009 Describe Yourself: Occasional Exerciser Bottom Line: No, I would not recommend this to a friend Comments: they are just boxer shorts
|