Reviewed by Centexan from West of Austin on Monday, November 10, 2014
I bought these, had them hemmed by my regular tailor and put them in the closet. When I was storing summer clothes I stumbled across them. I had forgotten that I had them. I had one more warm weather chance to try them out but when I put them on and tried to wear them, I took them off. The waist was very large, like other reviewers say probably close to two inches, there weren't enough belt loops and the adjustment tab on the sides was not functional (I think they sewed the button on the wrong side). Other than not fitting properly (pretty important), they appear well made and the fabric is very nice. If they had fit, Id definitely keep them. I hadn't thought to donate them, but thats a really good answer for me
Reviewed by Robin Wilkes from Southern CA. on Thursday, October 23, 2014
The pants show quality manufacturing. However, the material is lighter than I expected and wrinkles easily. That said, I like them enough to keep them. They have nice touches in there design such as highly reinforced attachmens for the buttons and Madras lining in the waist band and pockets.
Reviewed by Steve-o from California on Wednesday, August 20, 2014
These pants appear to be quite well made, but in a style that was not evident in text or photos. They are generously cut in the waist and thighs, but taper to quite narrow in the lower leg. I have rather skinny legs and even on me, the pants were weirdly tight in the calves. Unless you are specifically seeking this sort of look, customers with more normal or muscular legs may find these pants uncomfortable.
Reviewed by Chris from Lawrence, KS on Thursday, November 01, 2012
Not sure who this was made for - someone with both a bigger belly and skinnier legs than me; I'm 6' 180 lbs. The waist is inches too big and the legs are a little snug. Also, the crotch length is too short. And, the snug-ties on the sides have a short length for the strap, and a long length for the buckle; they are practically useless.
Reviewed by R from CA on Monday, November 28, 2011
Inconsistent fit with Canterbury's shorts & pants. Got size 32 shorts & they fit a bit too small...size 33's were more comfortable. Following my experience with the shorts, I got size 33 of these pants and they were about 2 inches too big around the waist but the legs would have felt uncomfortably slim fit.
Plus the material is very wrinkly...too much ironing required.