Overview
About Craghoppers Insect Shield® Simba Pants - UPF 40+ (For Men)
Closeouts. From airport to Africa, Craghoppers' Insect Shield® Simba pants are designed for adventure! They keep you comfortable on the move with thoughtfully placed seams, protect you from the sun with UPF 40+, and ward off disease-carrying insects with an Insect Shield® treatment. A hidden zip pocket secures your valuables.
- In business since 1965, Craghoppers designs high-performance clothing for outdoor enthusiasts who travel the globe in pursuit of adventure
- UPF 40+ sun protection
- Permanent Insect Shield® treatment repels mosquitos, ticks, ants, flies, chiggers and midges, which can carry lyme disease, west nile virus and malaria
- Made with lightweight and durable nylon that pulls moisture away and dries quickly
- Soft mesh lining in rear waistband for airflow and comfort
- Zip fly with double-button closure
- Mesh-lined hand pockets with hidden zip security pocket
- Rear patch pockets with button closures
- Drop-in tool pockets at right thigh
- Inseam gusset improves mobility and moves seams away from high-chafe areas for comfortable movement
- Articulated knees allow a greater range of motion
- Reinforced hems boost durability for long-lasting wear
- Imported
Specs
Specs about Craghoppers Insect Shield® Simba Pants - UPF 40+ (For Men)
- Features: UPF
- UPF Rating: 40
- Closure: Zipper,YKK®
- Inseam: 31" (based on size 36)
- Fabric: 100% polyamide
- Care: Machine wash
- Weight: 13.8 oz.
- Imported
Reviews
Do you own this product? Write a review and help others with their buying decisions!
2.714285
5
Overall Rating: 2.7
2.714285
Based on 7 reviews
Most Helpful 5-Star Review
5.0 out of 5 stars.
Love these pants!
Reviewed by BKTvet from Chattanooga, TN on Wednesday, August 10, 2016
-
3.0 out of 5 stars. Runs smallVerified Buyer Reviewed by Hiker 1 from Washington on Wednesday, November 9, 2016These pants seem great if you need the insect shield but do not feel as comfortable for everyday wear. They run really small (ordered a 40 and felt like a 36, 38).
-
1.0 out of 5 stars. Tiny hand pockets, short in the riseVerified Buyer Reviewed by John from South Jersey from South Jersey on Tuesday, September 27, 2016have other Craghopper pants which fit well these are short in the rise and uncomfortable, on the way back to sierra trading post
-
3.0 out of 5 stars. Mislabeled.Verified Buyer Reviewed by Westie from Albany NY on Thursday, August 25, 2016While the pants appeared to be well made the size was mislabeled. The pants were labeled as a size 36. However, the waist measured only 34" and were returned.
-
5.0 out of 5 stars. Love these pants!Reviewed by BKTvet from Chattanooga, TN on Wednesday, August 10, 2016These pants are a nice combination of lightweight but durable material. These pants are a little slim fitting, and I had to order a larger size. Normally I wear size 38 so I ordered 40s. I took 2 pairs on a trip to Costa Rica. I was working in some tall thick brush during the rainy season. At the end of the day these pants still looked great, no scratches or snags, and no bug bites.
-
1.0 out of 5 stars. horrible sizing, great pantsVerified Buyer Reviewed by brent from michigan on Wednesday, August 10, 2016i bought these pants for a recent camping trip. very nice quality but they are at least 2 sizes to small. I ordered a 38 waist so they would be a bit big on me and i could not even come close to putting them on. i gave them to my 13 year old who wears a 32 inch waist and they fit him. they were big but even without a belt they did not fall off him.
-
3.0 out of 5 stars. Short cut, and tightReviewed by Anonymous from Utah on Tuesday, July 19, 2016I am not a big guy, but ended up sizing two full sizes to get some room in the legs, waist and crotch. I have opted to wear a belt. Even so, the length is short, but that works fine for being out in the woods with boots.
-
3.0 out of 5 stars. Craghopers Simba Pants - too short!Verified Buyer Reviewed by Disappointed in KTM from Florida on Monday, July 18, 2016These pants fit great, nice fabric, I wanted them for my trip to Kathmandu. They would have been great here! My wife even said they look good on my bum, BUT the inseam on the 32" waist was 30" and that was supposed to be 'regular". I'd say 'short' was closer. STP made me pay to ship them back, too, even though the pant length was way out of spec. Not satisfied a customer with that transaction.