Better/Cheaper than Under Armor

Verified Buyer Reviewed by elbandito6000 from Orange County, NY on Friday, November 23, 2012
I'm 6'1", thin at only 160 lbs. Size: waist31-inseam32 in jeans. I'm thin but tall so the small size fit snug and going for this "Tall" choice worked out great for me and fits better than any "$50 Under Armor" pants would! Ready for Snowboarding and I love it!
Previous Review “Great value”
“Big Disappointment” Next Review